Showing posts with label blockbusters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blockbusters. Show all posts

Friday, May 25, 2012

The Debut of Star Wars



Most people probably don't remember what movies were like before the "Star Wars" franchise was born on this date in 1977.

I do, but, in all honesty, I don't remember the "Star Wars" premiere. There was no fuss about it that I can recall.

It was definitely a "summer blockbuster" — it was made for $11 million and wound up earning nearly half a billion dollars — but the concept of the summer blockbuster was still new. Hollywood has turned it into a marketing art form, but it was still a bit primitive in 1977, and, to be candid, "Star Wars" caught nearly everyone by surprise.

Today, it isn't uncommon for movies to spend a month or so at theaters — if that — before being yanked and prepared for cable and home video markets, but, in 1977, cable represented an extremely small share of the market, and home video was still in its infancy.

Thirty–five years ago, movies often spent months showing at theaters, many of which were still single–screen facilities, and then went on to drive–ins, where the objective was to squeeze a few more dollars in revenue, after which they were relegated to commercial television.

In 1977, successful movies spent months at theaters. It was the flops that were gone in a matter of weeks, seldom to be heard from again.

And there were some movies that got quite a bit of fanfare upon their release — but "Star Wars" wasn't one of them, and such fanfare could accompany just about any movie at just about any time of year.

It probably seems remarkable today, but movie promoters seemed to be oblivious, at least until 35 years ago, to the fact that there were huge potential audiences out there — teenagers — who had time on their hands and money in their pockets.

But nothing about "Star Wars" seemed designed to appeal to a mass audience.

With the exception of Alec Guinness, I suppose nearly everyone in the movie was an unknown to the moviegoing audience, and the book upon which "Star Wars" was based was familiar to sci–fi fans — but few others. James Earl Jones, of course, was familiar in both face and voice, but only his voice was used in the role of Darth Vader.

I was working on a maintenance crew that summer, and one of my co–workers — Brad — told me under the least glamorous conditions imaginable — while we we stood knee–deep in fresh manure and shoveled it into flower beds — about the movie he had just seen.

Now, Brad was a sci–fi fan, and he had read the book. He raved about the movie, and I promised him I would go to see it — probably figuring that I never would.

But I did, about three months later. It was a group excursion from my hometown of Conway, Ark., to the nearby state capital of Little Rock to see the movie.

"Star Wars" had been causing quite a stir by then. Promoters of that time hadn't done the things that promoters would do in years to come, and they had to play catch–up as first the movie and then the double album soundtrack made buckets of money.

I was dating my first serious girlfriend — Karen — at the time, and she wanted to see the movie. So did her parents and her younger brother and sister — and the foreign exchange student who was living with them. And so did my mother.

So all eight of us piled into her parents' Volvo station wagon — four of us in the rear area — and drove to Little Rock one hot August night.

Karen and her family had only moved to Conway a year earlier. They had lived in northern California and Indiana before they moved to Arkansas, and the car they drove did not have air conditioning. I remember how grateful I was when we arrived at the theater, and I felt that wonderful cold air on my sweaty skin when we walked inside.

I was even more grateful when I got a cold drink and felt that icy liquid go down my parched throat.

But I felt no real sense of excited anticipation before the movie began.

For that matter, I had no real sense that I had seen the first installment in a series of movies that would define the art of filmmaking for the next three decades. I enjoyed it, but, if someone had asked me, I would have said I thought it was a one–shot deal, an entertaining movie but with very limited long–term appeal.

In fact, I remember vividly being somewhat surprised when I heard Karen and her siblings speculating about what the sequel would reveal. Until that moment, I had not even thought about the possibility of a sequel.

With whom would Princess Leia end up — the rakish smuggler Han Solo or the still naive Luke Skywalker who was training to be a warrior? That was at the heart of their discussion.

As I say, I enjoyed the movie, but I thought little of the notion of a sequel. I didn't think there would be one.

History has shown that I seriously underestimated the market's appetite for the story.

Monday, June 22, 2009

The Summer Blockbuster Enters Middle Age

You may not realize it, but the concept of the "summer blockbuster" was born 34 years ago — on June 20, 1975, when Steven Spielberg's "Jaws" made its much–heralded debut.

Its opening weekend earned an eye–popping (for those days) $7 million — a figure that is dwarfed by the hundreds of millions that movies like "The Dark Knight" or "Spider–Man" are capable of drawing today.

Of course, a ticket to a movie cost a lot less in those days than it does today, and common sense would tell you that higher ticket prices mean higher box office receipts. But, even so, the earnings of some of today's motion pictures really are astonishing.

Still, that doesn't take anything away from those early "blockbusters."

But I have to wonder why no one figured out until 1975 that summer was a lucrative time to bring out movies that were likely to attract a lot of attention. The biggest box–office draws before "Jaws" came out typically were released around the Christmas holidays. The record–holder — even after the "Jaws" frenzy of '75 — was "The Godfather: Part II," which was released in December 1974.

And the movies that didn't quite earn what "Jaws" did in its opening weekend — "Magnum Force" (1973), "The Jungle Book" (1967), "The Poseidon Adventure" (1972) and "Diamonds Are Forever" (1971) — were not released in the summer. A noteworthy exception, I suppose, was "Psycho," which was released in June 1960.

Even two years later, when "Star Wars" caught everyone by surprise in the summer of 1977 and earned nearly $17 million in its opening weekend, the "blockbuster" marketing concept was not an accepted part of the movie business.

But that, too, has changed. For the last 30 years, the top moneymaking movies have been released in time to capitalize on the summer months — when young people have had time on their hands and money in their pockets.

Will the horrid economy affect the anticipated blockbusters this summer? It's hard to say. So far, only one of the top 10 moneymakers of 2009 — "Up" — has been released since Memorial Day.

I suppose we'll get something of an answer to that when the next "Harry Potter" film is released next month.